With All Your Heart
1985 Sermon 1985-11-03WITH ALL YOUR HEART
, November 3, 1985, 11:00 a.m. Worship Service
/ John M. Buchanan
Fourth Presbyterian Church, Chicago
"...you shall love the Lord your God with all your
heart, and with all your soul, and with ali your
might."
Scripture
Psalms 119:33-48
Deuteronomy 6:4-9
Mark 12:28-34
How in the world does one go about loving God? Where does one begin?
Over the years of sporadic reflecting on the nature of things most of us
have known something of awe, reverence, perhaps wariness and fear, But
love for God? We love our wives and husbands, our parents and children,
our friends—and lovers: we love Beethoven and chocolate chip cookies,
the Bears, the Bulls, the Black Hawks and sunny fall days. And when we
love we translate the inclinations of the heart into behavior that can
be wildly improbable -~- we weep over Beethoven, buy silly, extravagant
gifts for a lover, cheer and stomp and agonize over the Sunday afternoon
exploits of a new folk hero we know affectionately as "The Refrigerator!"
We translate the ardor of the heart te some kind of commitment, some
replacement of our immediate agenda with the agenda of the beloved and it
feels right and good so to do. But, how in the world does one go about
loving God? :
In her delightful spiritual journal, The Irrational Season, popular author
Madaleine L'Engle tells about a conversation she had with a minister in
which he criticized her use of adjectives which seemed to limit God,
Reflecting on the conversation she wrote a wonderful prayer...and called
it a Love Letter...
LOVE LETTER ADDRESSED TO:
Your immanent eminence
‘wholly transcendent,
permanent in firmament
holy, resplendent,
other and awful
incomprehensible,
nysterium tremendum
mysterium fascinans
infinite wisdom
one indivisible,
ex nihil creator
unbegun, unbeginning
complete, but unending
wind-weaving, sun spinning
ruthless, unbending.
Eternal compassion
heipless before you
I, Lord, in my fashion
love and adore you. Amen (P152)
One time a lawyer was listening in on a discussion Jesus was having with
some religious zealots on the topic of eternal life -- the resurrection.
The lawyer asked a question, perhaps to embarrass Jesus, perhaps to force
him to take a public position which might put him in trouble with the
authorities, perhaps because he was genuinely intrigued with Jesus's unique
handling of religious tradition. He asked: "Which commandment is the first
of all?" What is the greatest, most important of our religious traditions?
There was really very little Jesus could say other than what he said: "Hear,
O Israel: The Lord our God is one: and you shall love the Lord your God
with ali your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind and
with all your strength.” Everyone knew that. That's the Shema -~ from the
Hebrew word for "Hear": the beginning of the code of Deuteronomy. “Hear, |
OQ Israel, the Lord -- Yahweh -- is one. You shall love the Lord." It is
Said at the beginning of the Synagog service, it is recited twice daily, worn
in the phylactery, inscribed on the doorpost.
Historically, the Shema is the early and eloquent confession of faith that
sets Israel apart from the people around her who were busy worshipping a
lot of local deities, each with an individual altar or sanctury: It is
the rallying point of early monotheism, someone said. It is the bedrock,
the genius of Judaism. God is one -- and the basic human imperative is to
acknowledge that oneness and to love God,
And then Jesus amended his answer. He reached into the tradition again,
this time to an obscure sentence in the Book of Leviticus. "You shall love
your neighbor as yourself." He seemed to combine the two into one impera—
tive: "There is no other commandment greater than these" he said, as if
the one needed the other to stand. Indeed, that is the Judeo-Christian
genius: love of God, which could be a roctless abstraction, is tied to
love of neighbor. Love of neighbor which could be simple humanism, is
tied to love of God. Together they make a rich theological/ethical brew.
The overwhelming weight of Christian attention, however, has been on the
side of that second commandment, known as the Golden Rule: "Love your
neighbor as yourself." The earliest bit of homiletical advice I received
was from a long-time Presbyterian, who had seen many preachers come and
go, and when I came home from seminary to preach once during the summer
allowed as how he was very weary of the topical sameness he had been
hearing over the years and that if he had to sit through another sermon
of the Lord's Prayer or a sermon on the Golden Rule he was going to
stand up and protest that he had already heard everything.there is to
say on the topic.
I have not always been guided by that threat, but I have never preached
on either without wondering whether he had any soul mates in my congrega-
tion of the morning. Subconsciously, which is how these things ought to
work, I think his threat has moved’ me to reconcentrate on the first and
greatest commandment -- the one to love God with ail our heart, soul, mind
and strength. The one, I have concluded, we leave too quickly, either
because the Golden Rule is more interesting, or because we don't really
know what to make of this one. We may not always want to love our neighbor,
but at least we know how to begin. So let us consider...to love God with
all your heart.
an
The Deuteronomic imperative to love God sets forth the basic Biblical
assertion that our posture in relation to the creator is not one of
fear, or awe or guilt, but love. At the beginning Biblical religion
is other-directed: the initial Biblical word to us is a bidding to get
out of ourselves. Our first religious duty is to regard, not self, but
the creator. The earliest Biblical assertion about us is that we are
made to be in relationship with God, in fact, we are incomplete until
we acknowledge and affirm that relationship. St. Augustine said it best:
"O Lord, thou hast made our hearts restless until they find their rest
in thee..." In the Bible, it's not so much that terrible things will
happen to us unless we love God, it is simply that we will never be fully
human, fully what we can be, until we love the one who has created us.
The best of our Jewish tradition, the tradition which belonged to Jesus
and which he affirmed every opportunity he had, is that God is to be
loved for God's sake, not for the rewards it will produce. That position
has always been sharply in contrast to the kind of religion which promises
results and rewards. Have you noticed how the most popular religions today
appeal essentially to the self? Have you noticed the religious best sell-
ers: how to be religious and successful in business, have great sex, lose
weight, score thirty points a game or at least find peace of heart...?
Martin Marty has written that"in affluent cultures, a shift in the way of
iooking at reality has occured." We now know that shift as the New
Narcissism, the Mc Generation, the almost pathological obsession with
self described by Robert Bellah et al. in Habits of the Heart. That important S
book argues that our culture has simply turned self-centered, selfish...
and suggests as evidence "submersion in career, wanton consumerism, retreat
from public life, cynicism about politics, fear of commitment in personal.
relationships...and a "therapeutic ethic" which enshrines personal fulfill-
ment and self-knowledge as life's paramount goals. (See The Wilson Quarterly,
Autugn 1985 P145) Marty uses the rubric of "Entitlement" to describe it.
Our population he argues, “has acquired a taste for entitlements. We demand
the right to basic satisfaction." And while that-may be appropriate politi-
cally, what has happened in the latter quarter of the twentieth century is
that "entitlement" thinking has infected religion. "Universe, world, God
(we) seem to say, you owe me that quick fix, the sunshine in the heart,
the readiness to smile...In the world of the practical, God is loved for
the sake of one’s self, for the self's purposes, and for the yield of this
relation to the reward of eternal life." (A Cry of Absence, P33, 59)
You shall love God with all your heart...The best of Biblical religion
teaches love of God for God's sake, not for what it will produce. Popular
religion, on the other hand seems to be powered by a promise of some very
real rewards, material or at least emotional, or, the threat of punishment.
Sooner or later it seems, religion gets around to saying something like:
“love God for what it will do for you" and, if you can't do that, "love
God or else." I was privileged this past week to hear Education Secretary
William Bennett address the problem of school dropouts and the Administration's
effort to deal with it by linking the private sector to public education.
One time the Chief Executive Officer of Pizza Hut came to him with the
now famous scheme to reward students for reading two extra books with a
personal, free, pan pizza. Mr. Humphrey thought it had great promise
and would probably motivate younsters to read a lot. Secretary Bennett,
who likes to think of himself first as a scholar, listened and nodded
and then noted that Aristotle taught that learning ought to happen net
for the rewards it will produce, but for the pure joy of learming. Mr.
Humphrey listened and said, "That's true, but then Aristotle probably
never tasted a pan pizza."
Popular religion markets Jesus as a good investment, either for short-term
profit -- or long-term growth. But the richest and best of our tradition
teaches that religion begins with love of God with the whole heart, unre-
served love of God for God's sake. In his important latest book, Eternal
Life, Catholic theologian Hans Kung writes: "All the patriarchs of Israel;
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Moses and the Judges, the kings and prophets,
Isaiah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel, for their part passed (from life) into dark-
ness: and yet they had lived and acted in unswerving belief in God. For
more than a thousand years, none of these Jews believed in the resurrection
of the dead, or in an eternal life, or in the positive sense of a Christian
heaven. With remarkable consistency they concentrated on the present world,
without bothering about what was, in any case, a dismal, dark, hopeless
hereafter."' (P83)
We have something to learn from that depth of love that does not need, nor
ask for guarantees. We have something to learn from a trust in God's sov-
ereignty over all of life, including death, that we can simply and strongly,
turn over to God our future, without insisting on a warranty. That marvelous
Hebrew spirituality is reflected within the best of Christianty, too. Bernard
of Clairvaux, in the Middle Ages, told of his mystical vision of a woman car-
rying a pitcher and a torch. "With the pitcher she would quench the fires
of hell and with the torch she would burn the pleasures of heaven. After
these were gone, people would be able to love God for God's sake." (Op
Cit. Marty P59)
The trouble with practical, result-oriented, entitlement religion, is that
it gets into very hot water intellectually when tragedy happens -- as it
has a way of happening for all of us. If your religious premise is that
God rewards those who love him and punishes those who ignore him, and if
you retain even a bit of intellectual honesty, every day will produce a
major theological crisis. If love for God produces only good things, and
you must deal with the untimely death of someone you love very much, you.
have a major religious problem to say the least which is what Job and Job's
friends argue about. What the oldest of the Biblical traditions teaches
us is that a faith strong enough to sustain us, to help us through the
inevitable tragedies and losses and crises which come, must let go of the
reward-punishment mentality and love God for the simple sake of loving God.
Now there is a venerable Greek heresy alive and well among us which makes
us a little uncomfortable with the very notion of loving God, even before
the discovery begins. There is a tradition that suggests that our humanity
is so corrupt it isn’t even appropriate to suggest that we might love Gad.
~5-
Our love, itself, is too tainted. The rubric under which we have learned
this lesson is...Agape - Filia - Eros -- the three Creek words for love,
You’ve heard that sermon before, too. Eros -- sexual, erotic love; Filia —-
parental, brotherly, sisterly, friendly love; Agape -~ divine, selfless,
godly love ~~ God's love for us. And while it is true that there are three.
Greek words for love, what is not so palpably true is that Agape is wonder-
ful, Filia is okay, and Eros, while necessary for propagating the race, is
ethically a little troublesome. That, it seems to me, is what one learns
or concludes from hearing too many sermons on love. What we know most about is
Eros: what we know next about is Filia: and no one ever suggested that
they are appropriate words with which to discuss our love for God...What
we are left with is the selflessness of Agape, and that remains opaque,
distant. Hebrew religion, the religion of Jesus, didn't have all those
words for love. Our duty is to love God wholly, with our whole being,
not with an isolated spiritual compartment of the brain. Biblical religion
doesn't mean that. That is a Greek heresy. In the interest of making
something understandable it takes one reality apart -- human love -- in a
way that does terrible violence to it. When you separate Agape from Filia
and Eros -— you are left with a wispy abstraction. When you separate Eros
from the selfless good will which is Agape, you are left with what a friend
of mine eloquently describes as "hormones calling to hormones," pornography,
sex for the sake of personal gratification only. And when both Agape and
Eros are seen to be different from Filia -- the result is the grim task
of trying to sustain relationship without the sustaining joy of friendship,
and religion without the intimate relationship of a Lord who is father,
mother, brother and sister and friend.
If we want to know what Jesus the Jew meant by loving God we will have to
discard this Greek tryptic and recover the Hebrew sense of love's oneness,
Why not relate love for God to our experience of love? Why not define love
for God by the very best love we know: the love that surprises us with its
strength and calls us out of ourselves at the same time it is making us aware
of ourselves and allowing us to enjoy ourselves and bringing tears to our
eyes because of its sheer magnificent grace?
Why not understand our love for God in terms of the greatest gift he has
given us -- that marvelous, inseparable convergence of Agape and Filia and
Eros we have for our most intimate lovers and friends.
Love God with all your heart -- with all you are.
Love God, sensually, as the one who fashioned you, who created you as a
body with senses and needs and drives and ‘the miraculous capacity to be at
one with the creation.
Love God -- as your father, your mother, whose love for you will follow you
everywhere: as your brother, sister, dearest friend, who is for you and will
always be your advocate, your support, your defender.
Love God mystically, spiritually, -- as the source of your being, the myster-—
ious, unknowable ground of all that is.
Love God with all you are.
-6-
Something of that wholeness of love happens in corporate worship, I believe,
when choir and organ and congregation physically stand together and join
voices and in the best of times, hearts and minds and wills, in the pure,
unapologetic praise of God. Something of it happens, I believe, in the
honest and spontaneous piety of children, until we reason it out of them.
Madaleine L'Engle finds this wonderfully honest spirituality in the bedtime
prayers of her grandchildren: "God, I love to listen to the rain: I love
to listen to you talk," one of them prayed once. After asking God to bless
family -— mother, father, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, cousins ——- and
friends and pets, a four-year-old boy prayed, “And God, God bless you, too."
(Op Cit. P61) That's at the heart of it.
And something of this wholeness of love is celebrated in great music and art
and poetry. When I need to remember I listen or look or ask E. E. Cummings
to remind me: -
i thank You God for this most amazing day:
for the leaping greenly spirits of trees
and a biue true dream of sky; and for everything
which is natural which is infinite which is yes.
Of course love of God means love of neighber. Of course the ancient letter
writer was correct: if you say you love God and hate your brother or sister
you are a liar. Of course love is justice and justice is simply love at
work in the world. Of course loving God is hypocricy if it does not open
us to and make us vulnerable to the cries of the oppressed, the hungry, the
suffering, in Chicago, in Central America, or South Africa. The second
commandment is a product of the first. And if we get the first one right,
if we love God with all we are, our love for people who suffer will be far
deeper and stronger than mild affection -- or mild discomfort at what happens
to them. If we get love of God right, love of neighbor can become downright
revolutionary.
But, our Lord taught, we begin here, not with a fully developed theology,
not with a progressive social ethic, although we are responsible for both,
but with love for God -- with all our heart.
The ancient writer to whom Jesus turned when the lawyer asked him about the
greatest commandment suggested two remarkable truths.
We become fully human when we love the one who has created us.
That one, whose name is holy, wants us to love him, longs for our love,
pursues us for our love, suffers and sends a son to die, not only for the
sake of his love, but to cali ours out of us.
It is not a prayer you have heard much, nor is it one I have known to be
taught, nor is it one which I have either experienced or employed, but I
would submit, that the place to begin in response to our Lord's invitation
is with this singular prayer. God, I love you.
Amen
~7-
Lord of the creation, with all our heart and soul and mind and strength
we love you. You have made us restless until we find our rest in you.
You have made us wonderfully capable of love: you have put within us the
inclination, the desire, the need, the ability. Now call out of us the
indescribable, indefinable, unexplainable affection of heart, soul, mind
and body. Lord God, we love you: In Jesus Christ. Amen.
Original file:
Sermons/1985/110385 With All Your Heart.pdf