The Back side of God
1990 Sermon 1990-09-30B45
AE Te
September 40, 1990
8:30 a.m. Worship Service
John M. Buchanan
First Presbyterian Church, Kalamazoo, Michigan
scripture
Exodus 53:17-21 a
a Luke 9: 26 _
“Then I will take away my hand, and you shall see
my back; but my face shall not be seen."
Lene “Exodus 43:23 — —,
Wha “ \ A Goa ¥
In John Updike's novel, Roger's Version, a =
Fu hercmeee
young computer whiz kid comes to a divinity school
| nna] re ere
professor with a peculiar request.) He wants a
bd
divinity school grant to prove the existence of God
i al
on a computer. \ He believes that if he can just
crunch enough numbers, ultimate mystery will be
Dern me Dy
revealed. {"God is breaking through, } he says.
( “They've been scraping away at physical reatity all
se centuries, and now the layer of the Yittle
jJeft we don't understand is so fine God’s face is
staring out at ) Ep. 203
|
The Professor, Roger, responds (0d
your whole idea aesxeesitz Ph arrretritatly
repulsive. -cmekiedeemtieee because it describes a
God who Tets himself be intellectually trapped, and
i,
ether because it eliminates faith from
religion, it takes away our freedom te believe ar
i
doubt. \" God you could prove lakes the whole thing
immensely, ch, uninteresting. Pat. Whatever else
God may be, he shouldn't be pat.” \
There is in religion an almost irresistible
OY De |
inclination to explain everything, |to reduce. the
/——eeeen,
infinite to finite, understandable terns; \to reduce
CCE en, re Fe
the great unknown, the unfathomable, mysteries of
our existence to manageable dimensions, | that 1s
the theme of a wonderful story in the Book of
The scene is Mt. Sinai in the middle of the
wi iderness. | The children of Israel recently have
Srmaderatentetanrncioenae
escaped from Pharaoh at the Red Sea.| Now they are
re,
on the move, wandering through the Sinai desert.
When they come to the mountain, God and Moses meet
and tak. For thirteen chapters or so Ged and
Moses converse and negotiate. \ Moses receives God's
Jaw in the form of Ten Commandments. | when he takes
the two tablets on which the Taw is inscribed down
to the people, he disc overs them worshipping an
idol, a golden calf.\ In a fit of rage Moses
dashes the tablets to the ground, goes back up the
mountaip_to Presume the conversation with God and
Makes a simple request: \ Give me some proof that
ar ans
I'm on the right track.) I badly need some
credibility with these people. \Bo something to
show how semigys you are and how legitimate I am.
At least tell me your plans. God's response to
Moses is, FI will go with you, and I will dive you
Ce
the victory.
That wasn't the cuestion.\ So Moses tries
again and gets an equally evasive answer. \Moses is
Fe aaaaeeieree
nothing if not determined so he tries again but
reduces his demands a pit. Tf you won't do
something to give yourself -— and me - some
credibility, at least give me samething to haid on
to, some certainty, Let me see your glory - which
_—————
the the translators tell us means(‘“the dazzling
Tight of God's presence.”) And then Moses gets an
a
answer - of sorts...
"T will make all my goodness pass before you,
and will proclaim before you my name, but you
cannot see my face." | And then this wonderful
Tittle vignette, which can easily be missed -
"there is a Place be my where you shall stand
upon the rk ae while my glory passes by
I wit] put you‘in a cleft in the rock, and
L will cover you with my hand until I have
passed by; |then I will take away my hand
and you shall see my back: hut my face
F esieentenann cme
shall not be sean." / CExedus 33:21-23]
It wasn't such an unreasonable request,
really. not unlike what we want from our
i_
revigion.\ A little certainty. | He simply wanted a
Seep ll er
clear picture of who he was following and obeying.
he wanted to be sure of himself at least before he
pushed ahead into the wilderness at the head of
that Jong column of sriping, whining, goiden caif-
worshipeing-people on their way to 4 promised land
Lae
none of them had ever seen. \rt wasn't to bes No
face-to-face encounters with God for Moses — yet.
Moses was going to have to settle for the back
side of God... a less than complete theology.
ee
Moses was going to have to be content with some
— rr
poor symbols of the reality of God instead of the
ee eins
real thing - the memory of a burning bush, two
tablets of stone, \a voice that was maddeningly
Silent when he wanted to hear it....
There is in religion an almost irresistible
ri.
inclination to try to see God's face, \to reduce the
: aren
infinite to the finite.
Dr nee ell
Every SME
cruet
Ga“ fect Z $
yon’ ca om ane
Ni yee
One time Woody Allen and Bilty Graham were on
—— aes
the same television talk show.\ Allen was asked 1f
he might convert on camera.
"T'm open £0 it. ( Life, it seems to me, is
much easier if you're a believer. | You can always
Wer
come up with easy answers.” } [cited by Martin E.
Marty, Context, Feb..£74, 1989. from Free Inquiry]
But it doesn't work There is a mystery
al ere
about us that defies exelanation. \ If yOu have
been in Tove you know that the experience is not
Daa] Dn]
adequately described as rormanes calling ta
hormones.”) If you have been privileged ta witness
human birth er human geath you knaw that there ts a
el,
moment when science is no Tonger adecauate and that
you are in the presence cf mystery. \ugan nature,
capable of exquisite beauty and the grossest evil,
Sateen
cannot be explained simply. Pissstbaaglimemiaspa=
T was reminded of an entry in Robert Cole's
Harvard Diary, the point of which was that if
religion that “knows it all" isn't adequate to the
Ce
mysteries of Vife| neither is an absolute commitment
ta scientific objectivity.; Coles tells about
See
visiting a medical school classmate who was
terminally 771. [ He found his friend furious
because he had just been visited by the chaplain
vanicinieniceerr
who was abviously a skilled practitioner of the
latest psychological (and therefore scientifically
a
respectable} methodotogy. Cow was the patient
feet ing..| How was he 'managing' in view of the
‘stress’ he had to ‘confront.’ \Did he want to
‘talk about’ what was happening?” | ‘The priest,”
says Coles, “no doubt believed himself to be
tackful, respectful and considerate, but my friend
was apnoyed and Tater Eres | He had wanted to
talk with the priest about God and his ways,\ about
Christ's life and death | about heaven and hell —
only to be approached with psychological words and
phrases. (ere he comes with a Roman collar and
mi
offers my psychological banatities as God's word.
{p. 10-12]
The stuff of your life and mine is loving,
Leta all
yearning, hoping, dreaming, stretching, reaching
beyond our grasp, (sometines succeeding and
iad
Te
sometimes falling flat on our faces, suffering.
doubting, despairing, but also rejoicing,
celebrating, praying, dying...
——
mystery, all of it; fone of it able to be reduced
ree,
to simple, understandable formulas or platitudes.
Ce
God doesn't give Moses a gocd look for Moses’
Te
awn sake. } In the Bible, if you see too much of God
you die.} If there is no mystery eft you are na
longer human, it would seem. |If there is no
i
mystery Teft you no longer have the option of
faith.
e™ Follow the disciples up the mountain of
ed
transfiguration, where - if anyone ever had a
chance to Jook into the face of God it was them -
and know with a terrible finality that they didn't
do it either.) When whatever happened on that
mountain — Jesus’ face shining, \nis appearance
altered, \nis clothing dazzling white - whatever it
§
is Mark is trying to tet] us about Jesus, what he
ends up telling us is that the disciples were
a _—
distracted, bored, sleepy through most if it; fer
ee
what they catch of it they completely
misunderstand. | The mystery remains as a cloud - \>
descends over the whole scene. X yat wwe’
~ Gwe? Wi
And so it goes throushout,? until this one, wa das au
against all the common sense advice of his best Ws
, , , Soe Ly
friends, follows his sense of God's will and watks ¥
——- Ase
into the valley of the | Shaclow of death and
Titerally climbs up onte a cross and dies.\\ There,
we, at thet Final
mystery, the death of Jesus Christ on the cross,
there the reality of God is unveiled, the truth
about God and about us is disclosed.
a
In this life we may never see otearty.| St.
Paul, who was more sure of some things than anyone
- confessed the mystery with a paienancy and
integrity we have come to love...
"Now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face
to fee. | hm I know in part; then I shall
g
understand fully, even as I am fully
understood." [7 Cor. 13:12]
The promise of the Gospel is not that we will
have answers to all our questions and that al? our
quandries and dilemmas will be solved. \ The promise
of the sospet is that ultimately we will see God...
In the meantime, (like Moses, we'll have to do
with the back side of cou \a glimpse of the truth,
a hint of the glory. \In the meantime, there is
this man who livedand loved and died for us| And
untt] that day when you and I see face to face, it
Ae
1s
him to Tove us, and te hold tightly to him.
Amen.
10
(6 ue Al aee Lo Kae ul Masten of
Gene
} Noman = & AONF \our Gm vs
Our MA
4 Couse yt ts (ta a
want Vas res
midsk A urine <
September 30, 1990
8:30 and 11:00 am. Worship Services
Jann M. Buchanan
First Presbyterian Church, Kalamazoo, Michigan
scripture
Exodus 33:17-23
MARK Gi. Q2 87 34
"Then I will take away my hand, and you shall see my back;
but ay face shall not be seen.” -Exodus 33:23
Among the wisest words ever said to me are these...
\ "what the Christian Church needs is more belief, not more beliefs." |
It was said to me by a retired Presbyterian
ad
minister on an auspic3 jon in my lite| I
Swnionere Was A. 4 Clue
had traveled from Chicagofto my home_in Central
to be
Pennsylvania adicsilmmnedblons
De aad t
examined by my Presbytery for apdination. { Among
the requirements ainemamenes along with
il
preaching a sermon to the Presbytery and presenting
by ee
@ papeto demonstrate that you knew something
about the Bible and how to use it, \was a statement
af faith which the candidate for ardination read,
and then defended orally - in front of the entire
Presbytery.| It was a harrowing experience.
ed
Preparing that statement of faith was a harrowing
Eee ee
experience,\realizing that at this point one had to
. peadwen, @udlessly dicots,
. studying, writing papers and
"stand and deliver." \ For the purppgses af showing
fitness for ordination, I did wnat most candidates
do, I have discovered -
Namely, cover,
Lae
from creation to human.sin and salvation, from
eT Eo, el
a lot of ground, touch every base
Bible. to Church History to Eschatology,
illustrating each point with a broad range of
historical references, from the early church
Oriaqew, Lraneus,
fathers -¢ Jerome and Augustine - to the big.B's of
the 60s - Barth, Brunner, Bultmann and Bonhoeffer.
Now the saints in Pennsylvania were pot at
al1_sure why I was preparing for ministry in the
Midwest. instead of Princeton or Pittsburgh. where
most of them had matriculated. Péedeaeauygigeiiheepesenec tit L. 4
ec |
nl
tinkaeeo] was more noted for John Dewey's
progressive ideas about education, | and Enrica
al = ves
2
Fermi's atomic bomb than for turning out
theologically sound preachers. \ I recall] hoping \
—_ Pale” CepuM ES TK hee
that I could dazzie them i jn fact, they were ta hes HK”
generous and did vote me in. \1 was feejing pretty
good when among the well wishers afterward there
was this retired minister who Tived in State
Collese and had taught a little philosophy at Penn
nee
State. \I have remembered what he said with more
gratitude than anything else that happened that
day, | He said he liked my statement of faith - but
thought it was actual ly ee v9h >. said that it
was his experience the longer he Tived, that he
believed fewer things but believed them more that
his life had been a refining and sharpening. Cvour
statement of faith was good.) he said, out YOu
don’t have to betieve all that. Focus on a few
al
things and really believe in then..\ What the
Christian Church needs," he said. ("is more belief
and fewer eters")
I have found his advice to be true. | There's
a sense in which I don't know nearty as much as [
did about a lot of things twenty-five on thirty
years ago. | to be twenty years Qld is to know
al
what's wrong with the world and how to fix it.
eee —— ah. ° .
There's a wonderful incident in Woody Allen@® movie
m2, in which a young man, passionately in
‘ernie
search of meaning and purpose wants to discuss the
Holocaust with his father. (“what does it mean?‘7 he
ae nie al
asks. { "How should I know?/his middle-aged father
alearcoaemaiaiin, Fal
answers. Cr cant even understand how to operate
the electric_can opener. How am I supposed to
understand the Holocaust?7 I read somewhere that
Saul Bellow moved from New York to Chicago because
La enema
Oe niateeemad
(‘re was fed up with intellectuals who had to have
an opinion on everything."f [See Leonard Sweety, in
Liberal Protestantism, Michaelson & Roof, p. 253.]
There is in religion an almost irresistible
inclination to explain everythings to reduce the
a
infinite to Finite Nf nderstandab le terms\ to reduce
the great unknowns, the unfathomable mysteries of
al
our existence to manageable cinensions.\ That 7s
—-
the theme of a wonderful story in the Book of
Exodus which is delightful in its playiiness but
profound in its humanness aad @tesieeeLly.
nil
The scene is Mt. Sinai in the middie of the
wilderness, \ The children of Israel recently nave
escaped from Pharaoh at the Red Sea. \ Now they are
on the move, wandering through the Singi desert.
When they come to the mountain, God and Moses meet
and taik.\ for thirteen chapters ar so God and
i ee
Moses converse and negotiate. \ Moses receives God's
Jaw in the form of Ten Commandments. | When he takes
Stee emiil AT
the two tablets on which the Taw is inscribed down
eel
to the people, he discovers them worshipping an
idol, a golden calf.\ In a fit of rage Moses dashes
ee ee
the tablets to the ground, ; goes pack up the
mountain to resume the conversation with God and
makes a simple request Give me some proof that
I'm on the right_track. \l badly need some
credibility with these people.\ Do something to
show how serious you are and how tegitimate I am.
ee Le |
5
ft
At least tell me your plans. | God's response to
~o act
Moses is (°I will so with you, and I witl give you
; 1, ~ Gods CSU Vow a Vice
the victory. a! q ir GL vad: Wok lack
a ey,
. - A
That wasn’t the quest ion. | So Moses tries Ya rea, Wade
again and gets an equally evasive answer. Moses is
al —
nothing if not determined, so he tries again but
a,
reduces his demands a pit. \IF you won't do
— Eee
something to give yourself - and me.— some
credibility, at least give ine something to hald on
Leal
to, some certainty Let me see your glory - which
‘te ec
the translators tell us means\"the dazzling light
of God's presence: then Moses gets an answer
- of sorts...
"T will make al] my goodness pass, before you,
and will preclaim before you my name, but you
cannot see my face."\ And then this wonderful
a el ——
little vignette, which can easily be missed —
ening,
"there is a place by me where you shall stand
meena
upon the rock;
——
and while my glory passes by I wil] put you
in acileft inthe rock)
Ray, and I will cover you with my hand untiy
[ have passed by;
then_f will take away my hand and you shat]
see_my_ back; but my Cone
€@% shall not_be seen." }texcaus 33:21-233
It wasn't such an unreasonable request,
realty. not unlike what we want from our
religion\ A little certainty, \ He simply wanted a
Clear picture of who he was following and obeying.
rae. SneTter ey, mnie mer
He wanted to be sure of himself at least before he
pushed ahead into the wilderness at the head of
that long column of sriping, whining. golden calf-
worshipping-people on their way to a promised land
none of them had ever seen.\ It wasnit to pe\ No
face-to-face ema hters with Godc_for Moses —yet.
Moses was going to have to settle for the back side
ER ao 72
of God..{ a less than complete theology. \ Moses was
Le
gaing to have to be content with some poor symbols
—
of the reality of God instead of the reat thing -
bel bn al
Owe vereuyes
the memory of a burning bush | two tablets of stone,
Dahil rine,
a voice that was maddeningly sijent when he wanted
i,
to hear it...
There is in religion an almost irresistible
inclination to try to see God's face,| to reduce the
infinite ta the Finite. \ In thealogy the name for OVA fer wk. “|
headend a!
it is “anthropomorphism' which means making God
Took ke a human being. \ Michelangelo painted the
Or ineataiainal
God of creation as a muscular Zeus stretched acrass
rc eS
the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel }| and the soaring
rhetoric of the Westminister Assembly which wrote
the basic theology of Presbyterianism back in the
casos’
rte
~ Gs
17th century ~<a came up with the rhetorical
—_
equivalent of the Sistine Chapel...( “There is but
one only living and true God,f invisible, immutable,
i,
aed
immense, eternal, and incomprehensibie,") etc.,
etc., as if the mystery of God can be contained if
we can just find art__ beautiful enough or words
super lative enough.
Reinhold Niebuhr once noted that there is
Cnn ed
more religious confusion generated by/"thase who
—
claim to know too much about the mystery of life
than by those who claim to know too Tittle.” ) {iee-
to eige Ly abe de
Man at a ETE a eet te
Zo/i1 Niebubr went con to abserve that people who
claim to know too much fal ] into two categories,
the scientific rationalists who don't beTieve
anything that cannot be weighed, measured, tested,
and proved in an equation and religious people
who know everything there is to know about eternal
mystery.
"They barrish the aystery.) he said. \ and
then, with a twinkle in his eye, I am sure, (They
Know the geography of heaven and hell. and the
furniture of one and the temperature of the otter)
There is, of course, great appeal to a
a el
rational rejigion which has an answer for
nena te | ehh el
everything.
In John Updike's novel, Roger's Version, a
young computer whiz kid comes to a divinity school
professor with a peculiar request. \ He wants a
divinity school grant to prove _the existence of God
on a computer.] He believes that if he can Just
CRs en,
crunch enough numbers, ultimate mystery wil] be
revealed. "God is breaking throush,"} he says.
Oe
“They've been scraping away at physical reality all
these centuries, and now the layer af the little
left we con't understand is so fine God’s face ts
staring out at us."/ (p. 20]
The Prefessor, Roger, responds G find your
vn an
whole idea aesthetically and ethically repulsive.
Aesthetically because it describes_a God who lets
i
himself be intellectually trapped, and ethically
because it eliminates faith from religion, it takes
away our freedom to believe or doubt. | A God you
could prove makes the whole thing immensely, oh,
uninteresting. \ Pat. \ Whatever else God may be, he
shouldn't be pat.”
Cut sir, think of the comfort to ali those
who want to believe but don't dare, because they've
been inteTlectually intimidated. \Think of the
reassurance to alt those in trouble or in pain and
wanting to pray." )
fp, 24} ~~
10
a rOMRON pure hy
There is enormous appeal to af ais with
simple pesolutiscns to comptex dilennas.| How lovely
Aborts Albata
if #82 Roe versus Wace seeeammaeaaseeedon would
submit to biological and moral certainty.| But it
mae
wit] not.\ People of gocd will, distinguished
people, disagree about the definition of even the
EET
most basic_terms Anite, conception, viability. | We_
are in the presence of mystery here and shouting
our position through a bull horn does not atter
thet fact.
There is enormous appeal to a religion that
reduces mystery, makes the infinite finite and — inclodms Ovf
encompasses the whole terrain of our humanness ina ev‘ \Aanat dese}
sequence of formulas everyone can understand,
, Wary » Subunit $s ™ ay,
mse V Stab. a be
One time Woody Allen and Biliy Graham were on
the same television talk show. | Allen was asked if
he might convert on camera.
eed
"I'm open ta it. \Life. it seems to me, is
=
much easier if you're a believer | You can always
came up with easy answers."/ Coited by Martin £.
Marty, Context, Feb. 14, 1989, from Eree Inquiry]
But it doesn't work. \ There is a mystery
a |
about us that defies explanation. \ If you have been
in love you know that the experience is not
Seen td ee
adequately described ag “hormones_calling to
hormones." ) If you have been privileged to witness
human birth or human death you know that there is a
moment when science is no Tonger adequate and that
ees, —_—
yOU are in the presence of mystery. Human nature,
capable of exauisite beauty and the grossest evil,
cannot be explained simply.
fascination with the Nazi era is\ that there is a
Coles tells about visiting a medical schgol “ -,
lassmate who was terminatly i11. \He found hi we eel
classmate whe was terminally 711. ound his -
friend furious because he had Just been visited by
De eee eT _e
the chaplain who was obviously a ski1ted
SE, fn renner |
practitioner of the latest psychological (and
eT,
therefore scientifically respectable) methodatogy.
(von was the patient feeling... How was he
see 7
‘managing’ in view of the 'stress' he had ta
al ee
‘confront.’ \ Did he want to 'talk about' what was
happening?) “The priest," says Coles, ( “no doubt
ba ren
believed himself to be tactful, respectful and
aimee Siro
considerate, but my friend wag annoyed and later
nraged e had wanted to talk with the priest
about God and his ways,& about Christ's life and
death, about heaven and helt - anly to be
bt
13
approached with psychological words and phrases.
eee
"Here he comes with a Roman coltar and offers me
psychological banalities as Gad's wore") [p. 10-
12]
My memory of the fast funeral I attended as a
a
worshiper and mourner, not as the presiding clergy,
is one of irritation at the minister, a friend of
lene nee
mine, for talking tco much.\ He Said $9 much more
than he had a right to say, I thought, much, much
——
more than I wanted to hear.\ What happened was not
si me tel The life we were remembering was anything
but Simp te. What the mourners were experiencing
was not simple. \it was offensive to be told that
it is all really uncomplicated ~ when oneJtcnows one
is in the presence of mystery.
The stuff of your life and mine ig loving) ;
yearning, hoping, dreaming, stretching, peaching
nary a
me)
beyond our grasp, |somet ines succeeding and
/
sometimes falling flat on our faces
eet
uffering,
none of it able to be reduced to simple,
understandable formulas or platitudes.
ial
And that is consistent with our religion.
-— The God of the Bible makes a pointofar. it
would seem.\ God doesn't give Moses a good Joo, for
M
oses' awn sake.\ In the Bible, if you see TOO AL much
ed
Dn tiered
of God you die\ If there is no mystery left you
are no longer human, it would seem. (If there is no
Neepenieisa Cn ad
Ti
a el
ystery left you no jonger have the option of
ema (Ee
faith,
[gud 0) sep reh ON jlich sesiz Aaa . + | / :
mystery, to approach the unanswerable questions
=e
f TVife ar fe and Jove and gina ancl aeatn ane and resurrection ~
he sheet mw eresagin, not in hopes that marae we") get
Mus grou?
t right and have the answers, because we wi ot.
oh EE
14
(Eu seed. sth, ees *
toad Bhi secur
We are invited ‘itmmdeget to approach the mystery
eee
because to de so is important.
|
rg the one who came as God's good and
[a
loving word to the human family - but always stood
pr Ee, Pe]
apart from_that that family, Na Ee fully understood.
; vends =
eS Fortow eienceismt up the
mountain of transfiguration, where - if anyone ever
Cd oy
had a chance to look into the face_of God it was
them - and to know with a terrible finality that
they didn't do it either. \ when whatever happened
on that mountain - Jesus' face shining, his
appearance altered, his clothing dazzling white ~
— ih
whatever it is Use is trying to tell ys about
Jesus, [hat he ends up telling us is that the
disciples were distracted, bored, \steepy through
most of it:\and what they catch of it they
completely misunderstand. The mystery remains as a
ee nner)
cloud descends over the whole joere.
nie te > wh
And so it goes throughout JAinti] tthe, —
against all the common sense advice of his best
friends “Por ows his sense of God's will and walks
ee
16
into the valley of the shadow of death and
Fiterally climbs up onte a crass and cies. | There,
this faith of ours proclaims, at that final
ary 7 cay
mystery, the death of Jesus Christ on the crass,
there the reality of God is unvei ted, \ the truth | There _ tu,
UL este yh -
b about God and aboutus is disclosed. y——# rt
ks Ree apercach the mystery... and at Gee My
the cross of Christ we stand in its presence... dee for us.
TLL
In this life we may never_see clearly. | St.
biel [eRe
Paul, who was more sure of some things than anyone
— confessed the mystery with a poignancy and
integrity we have come to love...
“Now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face
to face. | Now I know in part;\ then T shall understand
fully, even as FT am fully understood." [1 Cor.
13:12]
The promise af the Gospel is not that we will
have answers to 417 our questions and that all cur
ee,
gquancdries and dilemmas will be solved. fine promise
af the gospel is that ultimate ly we will see God...
Gor \ows vs= out " a fader!
Net leat “A enue!” Gb lang You - beuvs
une Wawa - Ami be Math You =
See. Grd.
In the meantime, Tike Moses, we'll have to do
ie 7
With the back side of cout a glimpse of the truth,
a hint of the glory. \ In the meantime, there is
this man who lived and loved and died for us. | And
until that day when you and I see face to face, it
@nougan
ipcnceent teiceicmmammmene ieee ih aaeeaneeed simply to allow
Eee
him to tove us, and to hold tightly to fim. Amen.
iS a
Give us grace, 0 Lard, to live with the
mystery of our own humanity and the mystery of your
lave for us. Give us the will to believe and the
courage ta live in the midst of uncertainty, aged
2 as your faithful people:
through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
18
Original file:
Sermons/1990/093090 The Back side of God.pdf